Sunday, December 29, 2013



In Delhi, these days the hot topic is corruption. A lot of people are talking about corruption, and still a lot more are talking about eliminating corruption. All and everyone are participating. Removing corruption has become a slogan of the day. Diverse views are being expressed about it.

Where the contenders are more than the resources available and the distribution of those meagre resources poses a problem, that problem is solved by the rules of corruption.

·       The Ration is limited and the ration cards are more. The objective is to secure ration;
·       The queue is long and the time at your disposal is less. The objective is to get to the counter;
·       The seats are limited and the admission seekers are abundant. The objective is get an admission

The instances may be many more. How to solve the problem? The only way in these circumstances is to get a privileged place.

Some theorists may try to solve the problem by laying down a merit criterion. Only the meritorious will get position. But this criterion does not satisfy the failed ones. He feels dissatisfied. This dissatisfaction is more aggravated if the feeling of depravation is coupled with availability of resourcefulness. This is the reality-approach. Those who aspire do not need a justification (of merit-criterion) they need a success; a selection. This gives rise to the thought of corruption.

The view what some people call – corruption is in fact a philosophy. The philosophy is that resources should win. It should win even against the merit. It should win against everything. Some resources are spent to make the remaining resources win and attain the apex position. The success and selection reside at this apex position.

The point is how one sees the corruption. First, it should be understood in its philosophical perspective. One sees corruption differently in different circumstances. If it favours the seeker then he chooses it and if it favours the opposite one then he criticises it. One view on corruption is largely dependent on one’s position – from where the one views it. This is called selective criticism.

In the present society, vituperating and abusing in the name of corruption is merely a selective criticism. In Delhi or for that reason in the whole society how many parents are ready to give up thinking of admission in a respected school despite of it being violative of the rule of distance from the school. How many people are ready to fulfil all requirements of documentation and medical check-up etc. for obtaining a Motor Licence rather than paying an agreed sum of rupees to get rid of this requirement?

If one’s claim is satisfied; it is satisfied conveniently; it satisfied without any rigours – then one is voluntarily ready to spend some money. The money is earned only for convenience. This thought of convenience emerges from the resourcefulness. This motivates for the violation of rules. But this is very natural thought. Along with economic development people start valuing their time in terms of money. If one can earn more in a time span then he prefers to pay for saving that time span. This payment is called bribe. This bribe is self-induced corruption. The seeker does it himself.

The question of payment becomes more pinching when two people lay claim to the same opportunity. If both these claimants are almost equally competent and meritorious then the problem poses still a bigger dimension. As per understandings of human nature, both the claimants will make effort to get a favourable outcome. This is the basic and foremost reason for that practice which these days, is known as corruption.

These days some people are in focus of media. These people are making promises to end corruption. It is not clear what they are saying. They should tell if they are promising to change the mentality of the people. They should tell if they are promising to change the approach of the people. They should tell if they are promising to change the result of evolution of humanity. Or they are just kidding.
Some of such luminaries may allege that this article is favouring – the corruption. It is not so. This article is neither for supporting nor for condemning it. It is just to understand it. It is also to understand those claims which are being laid down unscrupulously these days.

Corruption is a human tendency; a congenital approach of human mind; a result of spirit of survivability which has / has been developed during evolution. The present value system calls this human tendency with a bad name – the corruption. It is not clear what the future will do. The corruption may be useful; may be painful; may be illusive; may be convincing; may be agonizing; may be pleasing; may be tormenting yet it is the tendency of the human race and without it the human society would have not achieved its present form and status. It has to be understood as such.


Saturday, December 28, 2013

Imprisoned by Thoughts


Courtesy –
Have you ever realized your thoughts? When you embed your sensations in the words of a language they become thoughts. These sensations are about the world around you hence these thoughts are the gateways for this world to enter YOU. This world intrudes upon you through your thoughts.

Sit comfortably and observe your thoughts. These are either the memory of your past or desires of your future. Thoughts do not exist in present. In the present, only the existence exists. You should understand this thing.
… …
Observe the flow of thoughts. They are always directed outwardly from you. Thoughts drain you out of you. They create a vacuum inside you after you are totally drained out. This vacuum is then filled by the thoughts of the world. When you sit, you find thoughts of office, spouse, children, neighbours, high school camping, strategies to overcome the growth of colleagues and the thoughts of everything. But you are nowhere in your thoughts. Thought are never about you.
… …
Sit and try to regulate the flow of your thoughts. Just try to channelize them. Try to focus your thoughts, say, on your spouse. Soon you find that you have thoughts about everything but of your spouse. Your thoughts slip away from your spouse. Again try to keep your thoughts away a particular object, say, your dog. Soon you realize that the thoughts are again encircle your dog. You try your thoughts to take away from your dog but they come again and again around and about the dog. Thoughts are like untamed beasts. They are not in your control rather you are very much in their control. Therefore your statement that your thoughts are yours is not true. However it may be true to say that you are of your thoughts.
… …
These thoughts are not under your control. They are not of you. These thoughts are not ‘yours’. These thoughts are beyond your power. Rather you are of these thoughts. Moreover, they control you. You are completely filled with these thoughts. You cannot live without thoughts. These thoughts are swaying you in random directions in a random fashion. You are flowing in your thoughts. You are helpless before these thoughts.

These thoughts are not only overshadowing you in your awakened state but they have entered into your sleep also. While with eyes opened, you have hypertension. While trying to close your eyes you have insomnia. Your thoughts have incapacitated you. You want to do but are not able to do. Your thoughts have made you pathetic.

Now you are captive of your thoughts; a prisoner imprisoned in the prison of thoughts.

Get rid of Your Thoughts.
XXXXXXXX                                              XXXXXXXX                                       

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Rajkumar Kejri

एक आवत एक जात

कबीर के दो दोहे हैं

पतझड़ आ गया है। पत्ते झड़ने लगे हैं। नीचे गिरते हुए पत्ते बहुत डिप्रैस्ड फ़ील कर रहे हैं। एक पत्ता आखिरकार कह ही उठता है

पत्ता बोला पेड़ से सुनो वृक्ष बनिराइ
अबके बिछड़े ना मिलैं दूर पड़ेंगे जाइ।।

सनातन वृक्ष के लिए पत्तों का आना जाना उतना सीमित अनुभव नहीं है। वह अनेक पतझड़ और वसन्त देख चुका है। वह इस निरन्तरता को पहचानता है। वृक्ष ने उत्तर दिया

वृक्ष बोला पात से सुन पत्ते मेरी बात
इस घर की यह रीत है एक आवत एक जात।।

अतः यहाँ से इति AAP कथा – राजकुमार केजरी

भारतीय राजनीति को गौर से देखने वाले जानते हैं कि राज्यों का भारत में विलय, चीनी आक्रमण, नेहरू-निधन, कामराज प्लान, कांग्रेसी सिंडिकेट, संविद सरकारें और इंदिरा का उदय भारतीय राजनीति के मील के पत्थर तो हैं लेकिन युगाँतरकारी घटनाएँ नहीं है। इन घटनाओं पर भारतीय इतिहास ने करवटें तो बदली परन्तु राजनीति की धमनियों में वही खून दौड़ा किया।

लेकिन सन् पिच्छत्तर की इमरजैंसी ने जैसे पिछले पाँच हजार साल से सोते भारत को झकझोर दिया था। विपक्ष ने इमरजैंसी की अ-लोकताँत्रिक छवि की बहुत आलोचना की है। काँग्रेस ने उस निर्णय का बचाव किया है। इस राजनीतिक प्रशँसा-आलोचना से परे उस इमरजैंसी ने भारत के जनमानस को सोते से जगाया था। जागने पर जनता ने अँगड़ाई ली और अँगड़ाई लेते लेते 1977 आ गया था। तब भारत की उस निरीह जनता ने जो पाठ महात्मा गाँधी से पढ़ा था उसे दोहरा दिया। एक स्थापित साम्राज्य 1947 में चूर हुआ था दूसरा तीस बरस बाद 1977 में हो गया। वह भारतीय संदर्भों में हुई एक रक्तहीन रूसी क्राँति थी। तत्कालीन लेखों में लिखा गया कि 60 बरसों के बाद रूसी क्राँति भारत में घटित हो गई थी। परन्तु यह इतनी भर ना थी। रूसी क्राँति एक दिशा में चलने वाली रेल थी तो भारतीय क्राँति उससे अधिक व्यापक और गहन अर्थों वाली थी। इसके ये अर्थ और व्यापकता आने वाले वर्षों में साबित हुए। इसलिए भारत के राजनीतिक इतिहास को लिखते समय 1975 का साल बिना किसी हानि के एक रेफरैंस प्वाइँट के रूप में लिया जा सकता है। यहाँ इस लेख में समय की गणना साल 75 से ही की गई है।
… …
केजरीवाल ने जनता से वादे किये। उन्होंने जनता को कहा कि पुराने राजनीतिज्ञों का यकीन ना करो क्योंकि वे झूठ बोलते हैं। उन्होंने बहुत बेझिझक अँदाज में कहा कि वर्तमान राजनीति में जो लोग उनके साथ हैं सिर्फ वे ही ईमानदार हैं शेष सब बेईमान हैं। इतना ही नहीं उन्होंने एक ऐसी शब्दावली का प्रयोग किया जो बिल्कुल नई थी और जिसे याद करने के लिए भी दोहराया नहीं जा सकता। तमाम परिभाषित रूपों को तोड़ दिया गया। उनके साथ चलने वाले और स्वयँ को उच्च साहित्यकार कहने वाले लोगों ने तो ऐसे ऐसे भाषिक प्रयोग किये कि मदिरा पान के बाद सड़क पर लड़ने वाले यौद्धाओं ने भी दाँतो तले उँगलियाँ दबा ली थीं। समसामयिक सिनेमा का प्रभाव कहये या कुछ और कहिये लोगों को यह केजरीवाल – आल्हा बहुत पसँद आई और उन्होंने उसे बहुत ध्यान और चाव से सुना। अपने वोट के रूप में सकारात्मक उत्तर भी दिया। आज केजरीवाल बाबू पर सत्ता का चँवर डुलाया जा रहा है।

जैसा 1977 में भारतीय-काँग्रेस ने महसूस किया था वैसा ही 2013 में दिल्ली-काँग्रेस ने महसूस किया। अन्य विपक्षी दल भाजपा सदमा, राहत, हैरानी, घात और किंकर्त्तव्यविमूढ़ता (दुविधा) के मिले जिले भावों से ग्रस्त है। उससे ना बोलते बन पड़ रहा है और ना ही चुप रहते।
… …
ऐसे में नीले आसमान में सफेद घोड़े पर बैठा यह केजरीवाल नाम का राजकुमार जिस जादू की छड़ी को हिला कर भारत के समाज को बदलने की घोषणा कर रहा है वह कितनी विश्वसनीय है यह एक ऐसा सदका है जिस आने वाला समय बहुत जल्द जनता के सामने उतारने वाला है। लेकिन इसे सिर्फ़ समय के सहारे नहीं छोड़ा जा सकता। इसका क तार्किक आकलन आवश्यक है।


Friday, December 20, 2013



·       Sycosis is established after a suppressed gonorrhea, when the acute infection is driven in upon the vital energy by external methods of suppression, and it then becomes a systematic stigma
·       The Sycotic patient is exceedingly suspicious. The suspicion extends to the point where he dare not trust himself and he must go back and repeat what he has done or said, and wonders if he goes back and starts again.
·       He is suspicious that he will be misunderstood, that his hearers will give the wrong meaning to what he is attempting to convey.
·       The Sycotic patient is cross and irritable; he is absent minded in certain things, and finds difficulty in getting the right word
·       He forgets recent happenings, but remembers distant events very clearly.
·       The headache in the vertex is Sycotic in its origin; or there may be frontal headache. These are better by lying down and at night, especially worse after midnight.
·       This patient is restless and wants to be kept in motion, which ameliorates.
·       The hair falls out in circular spots; the hair of the beard falls. The Sycotic scalp perspires, but there are not the moist, matting eruptions of syphilis.
·       Children with "snuffles" are usually syphilitic or Sycotic; the Sycotic stigma has moist snuffles, but without ulcerations or crusts; the discharge is purulent, scanty, with the odor of fishbrine.
·       There is often nasal stoppage due to thickening of the membranes and to enlargement of the turbinated bones.
·       Hay fever conditions, which are exceedingly difficult of cure under ordinary treatment, are more easily understood when we remember that they are an expression of syphilis and latent Sycosis, very often with a Psoric taint.
·       Meats arouse the latent sycosis as in psora. The sycotic patient should take meat sparingly, and it is better for him to use more freely of nuts, beans or cheese. Gouty conditions cannot digest meats.
·       He is usually better by eating any food, and better by lying on the stomach or by pressure.
·    The diabetic patient is usually strongly tubercular, but if there is a sycotic taint as well, the condition becomes much more malignant.
·       In acquired sycotic conditions represented by prostatic gland troubles there is a combination of all three stigmata.
·       Pelvic inflammations such as inflammation of the ovaries, inflammatory diseases of the female pelvis may be traced to this taint.
·       Appendicitis is directly traceable to sycotic influences.

·      Stomach is swollen, distended called Ascites, Anasarca
·    There are tearing pains in the joints, which are < during rest, < during cold damp weather, > moving or stretching, > dry weather.

·      The Sycotic skin manifestations tend toward overgrowth or extra deposits. The nails are ribbed or ridged and thick and heavy. Moles, warts, wine-coloured patches and other manifestations of unnaturally thickened skin belong in this classification.
·       Psoriasis is a combination of the three stigmata, with sycosis and psora predominating
·    Barber's itch readily develops in sycotic patients, while it rarely develops unless there is a sycotic taint.


·       When suppressed, the syphilitic stigma spends itself on the meninges of the brain, and affects the larynx and throat in general, the eyes, the bones and the periosteum.
·       Psora spends its action very largely upon the nervous system and the nerve centers, producing functional disturbances, which are > by surface manifestations.
·       Sycosis attacks the internal organs, especially the pelvic and sexual organs. In this stigma we find the worst forms of inflammation, infiltration of the tissues causing abscesses, hypertrophies, cystic degeneration; when thrown back into the system by suppression this stigma causes dishonesty, moral degeneracy and mania.



Sunday, December 8, 2013

A case of Thuja - BRB

BRB: A case of Thuja

with courtesy from
Age 41 yrs



On 70.12.13 He reported

·       A Mild throbbing which started in May, June, July 2013 in right side semi lateral temporal region;
·       Twitching of eyes with a feeling of being shrouded in a dark cloud;
·       MRI at that time showed nothing noticeable
·       Later he started a pain in the inner aspect of elbow joint which doctors diagnosed as Golfer Elbow
·       His Uric Acid was also diagnosed as to have been increased;
·       Urine was of light pale colour with no odour
·       He was unable to eat red chillies which caused inflammation in oesophagous, urethra and anus; this inflammation could be washed only by drinking a lot of water
·       Has a problem with thyroid with TSH 9.7 in Aug. 13
·       To ameliorate all these problems he started to have walks which improved the things upto a great extent
·       Doctors were keeping him on Topamac 25; Petril Beta 10 and Thyronorm 62.5
In reply to questions put by me he told:


·       He reported about him as being sensitive, concerned with the future of his own children
·       Religious
·       Keeps reading religious books in free time


He has a continuous uncomfortable feeling in right semi-lateral temporal region, a dull pain with continuity
But his pain was asymmetric; it was only on one side and that too on right;
No noticeable cause or time of aggravation or amelioration was known


·       He usually drinks 6-8 glasses of water daily; 2 on waking and 2 at night
·       Water was taken at normal temperature; no preference for cold water; although in winter he may have Luke warm water
·       He does not have any craving for any food though he is a strict vegetarian
·       He takes normal diet, as guided by the specialists


·       He is a bit constipative, for a motion he needs two glasses of water on waking
·       It takes about 15-20 minutes in completing the evacuation process.
·       Stool is sticky, dark pale and without any specific odour


·       He has to pass it repeatedly and frequently; because of this problem he cannot travel by bus as he cannot retain it in that duration
·       No diabetic complaints
·       Urine is of light pale colour and without odour


·       Highly disturbed
·       On beds keeps lying for late engrossed with the thoughts of the day
·       With some sleeping pills now has a sleep for about 7-8 hrs and without pills it would reduce to 5-6 hrs
·       He has abundance of dreams; all related to the past;
o   Past characters appear in dreams in quite new avatar



·       Red, itching excoriations in thighs and scrotum
o   This is most aggravated in rainy season and after a long walking
·       Small warts on neck, both sides
·       Small eruption on cheeks, whithout any height from the cheek level,
o   Primarily it appears as if after ant-bites; diameter about 0.5 mm
o   Picture is attached
·       For last several months he has a feeling of prickling in body skin; it happens intermittently;
·       This prickling is aggravated by heat of the bed


·       He is uncomfortable in warmth and hot climate
·       He has a desire for cold air
·       Although the AC room causes his nose being stuffed

On 08.12.13 he is given

Thuja 30
3Times a day for 3 Days
            2 Times a day for 10 days

दिल्ली चुनाव 2013: अमूर्त मुख भाजपा

दिल्ली चुनाव 2013:  अमूर्त मुख भाजपा

PS Malik

पाँच राज्यों के चुनाव हुए। नतीजे आए। उनकी घोषणाएँ हुईं। अब आगे सरकारों का गठन होगा। सब सामान्य लगता है। राजनीतिक विश्लेषक अपने अपने विश्लेषणों में जुट गए।
परन्तु दिल्ली में कुछ अलग हुआ; कुछ विचित्र हुआ। इसे दो रूपों में देख सकते हैं। पहला तो एक नई राजनीतिक ताकत के रूप में केजरीवाल का उदय है। केजरीवाल का इसलिये कि अपने गठन और उसके बाद के काल में यह आन्दोलन जो पहले अन्ना की छाया में खड़ा हुआ था बाद में केजरीवाल की परछाईं के रूप में बड़ा हुआ है। आप नाम की राजनीतिक पार्टी केजरीवाल की परछाईं ही है। यह केजरीवाल का ही निर्वैयक्तिक विस्तार है जिसमें कुछ अन्य चेहरे टाँके गए नजर आते हैं।

दिल्ली के चुनावों की दूसरी विस्मयकारी घटना है – भाजपा की विजय। मदन लाल खुराना और साहिब सिंह वर्मा के वक्तों से लेकर दिल्ली भाजपा अपना कोई चेहरा ही नहीं बना पाई है। बल्कि पिछले कुछ समय से तो जिन चेहरों को दिल्ली भाजपा के सिंहासन पर बिठाया गया वे उसके सिर के ताज नहीं बन पाए सिर के बोझ जरूर बन गये थे। भाजपा को उन्हें खुद ही सिंहासन से दूर करना पड़ा। इस चुनाव 2013 में भी जनता ने उन चेहरों को नकार दिया। नतीजों में कहीं निचला क्रम ही उन चेहरों को मिल पाया।

जिन चेहरों को आगे करके इन चुनावों में दिल्ली भाजपा जनमत पाने को आई वे भी बहुत सकारात्मक नहीं थे। चमत्कारिक तो बिल्कुल नहीं थे जैसे कि केजरीवाल रहे और आप नाम की राजनीतिक पार्टी के रूप में उनका निर्वैयक्तिक विस्तार रहा। तो फिर भाजपा दिल्ली में चुनाव जीती क्यों?

चुनाव के तत्काल बाद मैं कई लोगों से मिला और जाना की उन्होंने किसे मत दिया और क्यों दिया। अनेक मतदाताओं ने बताया कि उन्होंने भाजपा को वोट दिया है। परन्तु अनेक मतदाता तो अपने निर्वाचन क्षेत्र के भाजपा प्रत्याशी का नाम भी नहीं जानते थे। उन्होंने भाजपा को वोट दिया था। इन चुनावों से पहले दिल्ली भाजपा का कोई जनआन्दोलन तो याद नहीं आता है। तब इस भाजपा वोट का आधार क्या था?

इसका उत्तर है – नरेन्द्र मोदी। चुनाव पूर्व में भाजपा का एक ही आन्दोलन याद आता है – नरेन्द्र मोदी। शायद पूरे देश के मतदाता को नरेन्द्र मोदी के रूप में एक नायक मिला है। उसी नायक की परछाईं जब दिल्ली पर पड़ी तो वह दिल्ली की गद्दी बन कर अवतरित हुई। दिल्ली की गद्दी दिल्ली भाजपा की कमाई नहीं है बल्कि मोदी की परछाईं का मूर्तिमान रूप है। ठीक वैसे ही जैसे कि आप नाम की राजनीतिक पार्टी की सीटें केजरीवाल की परछाईं का मूर्तिमान रूप है। इस प्रकार चुनाव 2013 दो व्यक्तित्वों का अभ्युदय है भारतीय कैनवस पर मोदी और दिल्ली के फ़लक पर केजरीवाल। दिल्ली में भाजपा लगभग बिना चेहरे मोहरे वाली सी है।

यह बिना चेहरे वाली दिल्ली भाजपा दिल्ली की गद्दी को प्राप्त को कर रही है पर इसका निर्वाह कैसे करेगी यह मूल प्रश्न है। अगर यह दिल्ली भाजपा जल्द ही एक सुन्दर जनग्राह्य रूप धारण नहीं करती है तो मोदी नामक जनआन्दोलन को नुकसान पहुँचा सकती है।

यह अमूर्त मुख भाजपा निकट भविष्य में दिल्ली में क्या करती है, कैसा रूप धरती है – इसकी प्रतीक्षा मोदी, केजरीवाल और दिल्ली के मतदाता सबको रहने वाली है।

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Understanding Women by her Hidden Language

There’s a saying that if you’ve been going out awhile, you can walk into a room and in as little as 60 seconds tell who is interested in you and who isn`t. If you want to learn how to attract women, this is a valuable skill. Ask around, talk to those who hang out at the clubs, you’ll see -- other singles will verify that after you have gone out for awhile you automatically start to pick up on this. They can never seem to explain how they know all this exactly (though they’re sure to have a story or two to tell you), but they just know.
Your Subconscious Reveals When And How To Attract Women - Pay Attention  
What happens is that after much experience, your subconscious begins cataloguing all the clues that automatically ring a bell and say, "This person is interested."
Read this statement given by one expert, who quotes a female with experience in this area:
One woman I know has been in the singles game for years [and] really knows how to operate. [She] tells me that she can be at a dance and get anyone [she wants] to dance with her. She seems to think she does it with ESP. She says, "I just look at them and think ‘come over and ask me to dance’" and they always do! She has taught some other girls the little secrets and they found it works, too. I personally feel, however, that it has nothing to do with thought transference or E.S.P. She and they are letting them know unconsciously by outside body language and their eyes.”

The experience of orgasm itself is always nonsexual. Even though you have achieved it through sex, it itself has no sexuality in it.
You can reach to orgasm through sex. It is a merger of the negative and the positive polarities -- such a deep merger that the man is no longer man, the woman is no longer woman. They are not two; there is only one energy surrounding them both. They have melted into that energy.
It may be for a moment -- that does not matter -- but the experience itself has nothing to do with sex.
The first orgasm is bound to be attained through sex. And my own understanding is that meditation has grown out of the experience of orgasm, because the original founders -- particularly Shiva who, in his Vigyan Bhairva Tantra, has written, just like a scientific formula, about one hundred and twelve meditations; each meditation just in one line or two lines.... The man is tremendously aphoristic. Those one hundred and twelve sutras are just like seeds. He has condensed everything about the method in them.
He is also known as a great lover. Perhaps he was the first man to discover meditation. And it can be very scientifically assumed that whoever experienced orgasm, if he had a little intelligence, would have seen that although it has come through sex, it itself is a nonsexual experience.


Thursday, November 28, 2013

Mediocre Minds Plead Reason, Higher Ones Transcend It …

Right from the beginning man has been in pursuit of acquiring knowledge. Initially he did it with the observations of the surroundings. Subsequently this study of surroundings was named as science. The sciences explained how the events take place, what are the causes and effects of particular events. This development of science took place in the background of religious beliefs where the rituals were mainly related to some unobservable results. For example the religious beliefs asked people to do good to get wealth in heavens. Sciences asked them to follow a particular series of acts to get wealth in this world. The religion asked for unobservable results mainly based on faith while the sciences asked for observable outcomes based on achievements. Human psychology preferred the later. People found sciences more convenient to them.
This preference was based on the observation of people that this world is objective which has an ultimate reality. They thought that this ultimate reality could be discovered through the scientific discoveries. This belief of people that the ultimate reality is discoverable through some scientific procedures was strengthened by those procedures themselves. When the science broke a particle a new sub-particle level was found. It was, therefore inferred that one day as the technology provides a suitable gadget the ultimate sub-level will be discovered and thereafter the sciences will reach their ultimate peak. This optimism of people about the ultimate reality through the scientific methods made them develop a psychological mental framework regarding the superiority of sciences, matter, objectivity, reason etc.
Then it came the twentieth century. A scientific revolution also came along with. Einstein, Heisenberg, Dirac, Plank, Bohr, Bose, Schrödinger and a lot more scientists joined the stride. Einstein told people that it was not the matter only but the energy was also equally important. Matter and energy were inter-convertible. When this all was on, Heisenberg put forward his revolutionary idea. He said that the position and velocity of a particle both cannot be ascertained simultaneously with the same precision. He gave a particular number that the imprecision would always be greater than that number. As per Prof. Dave MacCallum, November 20th, 2000 later it was realized that Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle applied not only to the relationship between momentum and position, but between non-continuous observables. If the spin of a particle in the z direction is known, then the spin in the y direction cannot be known. This is equivalent to the probabilistic aspects of quantum mechanics demonstrated in the Stern-Gerlach measurements and in the Copenhagen interpretation of the wave-equation. These probabilistic results are quite disturbing for a belief in absolute truth. Please recollect it, that it was the science itself which propagated the idea of the absolute truth at some sub – sub- atomic level of the matter. That idea was put at the stake by the scientific theories themselves.
Coming back to the science, Schrödinger is known for his declaration regarding the demise of the matter. Another contemporary, Neil Bohr was also saying the same thing but in different words. Neil Bohr proposed the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory, which asserts that a particle is whatever it is measured to be (for example, a wave or a particle), but that it cannot be assumed to have specific properties, or even to exist, until it is measured. In short, Bohr was saying that a particle may or may not exist at the same time. In other words he says that the objective reality does not exist.
Those who accept the new knowledge only if it is “contradiction – free”, should now reconsider their premises. The science never takes recourse of logic. It pursues observations. It then generalizes those observations and this generalization is called a scientific law. Logic is used by those who are not scientists, and want to discover the ultimate knowledge with the help of languages they use. They presume that their language is all capable.
To dispel there such belief consider one example. In Songhay, a language of African Sahara region, there are about 87 words pertaining to sand and 34 words for oasis. Each of these words has a specific reference to its individuality. If one has to translate a paragraph from Songhay  language to a European language having almost single words for each of the sand and the oasis, then the one has to lose some information each time one so translates. This is a drawback of the languages and not of the existence i.e. the sand or the oasis. Languages are generated by the past experiences of that section of population. It contains only those descriptions which this society has already encountered in the past. For a new incident, the languages always hesitate as they are unequipped.
There are two types of subatomic particles – fermions and bosons. Fermions have some characteristic values assigned to them (called their quantum numbers) while the bosons do not. No two bosons are distinguishable from each other. Are they all one – as per the Law of Identity? If not, is this some illusion? Scientists say that these bosons contribute more than the contribution of fermions in this universe. Then, for being violative of the Law of Identity, is this world a hallucination? Those who cite Aristotle even for curing a rotten tooth will not find a satisfying answer here. Leave them.
Now come to “reason”. (As per Wikipedia) The concept of reason is connected to the concept of language, as reflected in the meanings of the Greek word “logos”, later to be translated by Latin “ratio” and then French “raison”, from which the English word derived. As reason, rationality, and logic are all associated with the ability of the human mind to predict effects as based upon presumed causes, the word “reason” also denotes a ground or basis for a particular argument, and hence is used synonymously with the word “cause”.
A few things about “Reason” should be made clear. “Reason” is associated to those things which are the past experience. No reason can be addressed to some new situations. Nobody can reason the behaviour of a human body on a new planet. For that he needs to know the pressure, temperature, oxygen etc. over there and then  he would relate those variables to his past experience as to how a varied composition of these variables affects a human body. Nobody can address a reason for a planet X having an atmosphere of gas Y and a temperature T and pressure P unless some pre-known values are given to these variables X, Y, T, and P. You cannot rely upon a reason until select to be revolving in a given periphery of already known situations.
Sciences put a limitation on the ultimate effort of revealation of “THE EXISTENCE”. One cannot go down breaking the matter beyond a particular level fixed by Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. One can not go beyond a particular distance in space and that limit is already there in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. The existence is not available to you at all levels and all distances.
The existence is to be explored below the Heisenberg’s limit and beyond the Einstein’s limit. Science is not able to cross this scientific limit. New ways are to be devised. Age old tools of logic and reason, both made up of tautological material, are to be abandoned. New ways are to be evolved. But how? And what?
We will discuss it in the next article – “In The Pursuit Of Higher Consciousness”.